San Antonio’s Sales-Tax Slowdown Is No Longer Just a Midyear Warning

City sales-tax allocations nearly doubled between 2013 and 2025. Through September 2026, San Antonio remains 5.27% below the comparable 2025 period—even as most major Texas cities and the statewide city market continue to grow.

San Antonio’s Sales-Tax Slowdown Is No Longer Just a Midyear Warning
San Antonio's economy is slowing down and growth is struggling.hoto by weston m / Unsplash

Economy & Growth

City sales-tax allocations nearly doubled between 2013 and 2025. Through September 2026, San Antonio remains 5.27% below the comparable 2025 period—even as most major Texas cities and the statewide city market continue to grow.

By NATIONAL DATA SYSTEM for River Walk Magazine | Data analysis through September 2026


For more than a decade, San Antonio's sales-tax allocations traced the story of a city expanding through population growth, business investment, tourism, a resilient service economy and a dramatic post-pandemic recovery.

When River Walk Magazine examined the numbers through July, the question was whether a 5.65% year-to-date decline represented a temporary pause or the beginning of a broader slowdown.

Two additional months of data now provide a clearer picture.

August brought a brief improvement. San Antonio's monthly allocation increased 1.95% from the comparable period a year earlier, narrowing the year-to-date deficit from 5.64% to 4.64%.

September reversed much of that progress.

San Antonio received approximately $37.1 million in the September reporting period, 10.39% below the comparable $41.4 million payment in 2025.

Through September, the city has received approximately $356.7 million, compared with $376.6 million through the same period last year.

The difference is nearly $19.9 million.

The resulting year-to-date decline is 5.27%.

$499.3M
Full-year allocation in 2025

+84.95%
Increase from 2013 through 2025

$356.7M
2026 allocation through September

−$19.9M
Difference from comparable 2025 period

−5.27%
Comparable year-to-date change in 2026

Red bar graph shows a downward trend
Photo by Eyestetix Studio / Unsplash

A Twelve-Year Climb

San Antonio received approximately $269.9 million in city sales-tax allocations in 2013. By 2025, the annual figure had climbed to approximately $499.3 million.

That represents an increase of almost 85% over twelve years. Some of that rise reflects expansion in taxable economic activity, while inflation, population growth, changes in the tax base and payment timing can also affect nominal allocations.

YearAllocationAnnual change
2013$269.9 million—
2014$304.0 million+12.61%
2015$315.3 million+3.73%
2016$324.6 million+2.92%
2017$334.2 million+2.98%
2018$355.9 million+6.48%
2019$370.3 million+4.04%
2020$362.8 million−2.02%
2021$415.1 million+14.43%
2022$466.4 million+12.34%
2023$479.1 million+2.73%
2024$491.5 million+2.58%
2025$499.3 million+1.59%
2026 YTD$356.7 million−5.27% vs. comparable 2025 period

The long-term story therefore remains one of substantial expansion.

But the short-term story has changed.

From Slow Growth to Contraction

San Antonio's recovery from the pandemic was unusually strong.

After allocations declined 2.02% in 2020, they increased 14.43% in 2021 and another 12.34% in 2022.

Growth then slowed substantially:

2023: +2.73%
2024: +2.58%
2025: +1.59%

That progression matters because the 2026 decline did not immediately follow a period of accelerating growth. It followed three consecutive years of progressively slower increases.

The 2026 numbers have now pushed the trend from deceleration into year-to-date contraction.

The 2026 Pattern Is Becoming Clearer

January initially offered little indication of what was coming.

San Antonio's January allocation increased 3.60% from the comparable period in 2025.

Then the pattern changed.

2026 report monthMonthly changeYTD change
January+3.60%+3.60%
February−3.32%−0.47%
March−7.79%−2.52%
April−6.80%−3.44%
May−6.73%−4.17%
June−10.27%−5.17%
July−8.61%−5.64%
August+1.95%−4.64%
September−10.39%−5.27%

The sequence is more informative than the September figure alone.

After January, San Antonio recorded year-over-year declines in seven of the next eight reporting months. August was the only positive month during that period.

That does not establish the cause of the slowdown. But it makes it increasingly difficult to characterize the 2026 result as a single-month statistical fluctuation.

Nearly $20 Million Below Last Year's Pace

Through September:

2026 allocation: $356,739,763.54
Comparable 2025 amount: $376,608,962.36
Dollar difference: −$19,869,198.82
Percentage difference:
−5.27%

The September payment itself was approximately $4.3 million below the comparable September 2025 payment.

Sales-tax allocations should not be treated as a complete measure of the local economy. The Comptroller describes the reports as measures of local sales and use tax payments that can be used alongside other local indicators to assess economic trends. Texas Comptroller

Payment timing matters as well. Allocation amounts depend on taxpayer reporting and generally reflect sales made earlier than the distribution month. Texas Comptroller

San Antonio Is Diverging From Other Major Texas Cities

This is now arguably the most important part of the story.

San Antonio's decline is occurring while many of Texas' other large city markets are reporting growth.

Through September:

City2026 YTD allocationYTD change
Houston$718.0 million+3.30%
San Antonio$356.7 million−5.27%
Dallas$352.0 million+3.70%
Austin$285.5 million+8.01%
Fort Worth$200.3 million+8.20%
Arlington$160.1 million+10.08%
Round Rock$156.1 million+58.77%
Frisco$118.5 million+10.99%
El Paso$114.8 million+10.10%
Plano$101.7 million+0.83%

The broader Texas numbers reinforce the contrast.

The Comptroller reported that cities statewide received $816.5 million in September 2026 allocations, an 8.1% increase from September 2025, while city allocations were 6.2% higher year to date statewide. Texas Comptroller

San Antonio's −5.27% therefore sits roughly 11.5 percentage points below the statewide city year-to-date growth rate.

That doesn't establish why San Antonio is different.

But it establishes that San Antonio is different.

Most Texas Cities Are Growing

The city-level dataset provides another way of seeing the divergence.

Among 1,173 cities with a September 2026 year-to-date comparison:

848 were positive.

325 were negative.

The median city was approximately 5.28% above its comparable 2025 level. Pasted text

San Antonio is therefore not simply participating in a broad contraction affecting Texas municipalities generally.

Its trajectory deserves a more specific explanation.

What Could Be Driving the Difference?

The sales-tax dataset cannot answer that question by itself.

Several possibilities should be tested rather than assumed.

Tourism and hospitality are particularly important because San Antonio has a substantial visitor economy. But determining whether tourism is responsible requires examining hotel occupancy, room revenue, airport traffic, convention activity, mixed-beverage receipts and other visitor indicators.

Consumer behavior is another possibility. Household spending could be shifting between taxable categories or toward purchases made outside traditional local retail channels.

Business purchasing could also matter. Local sales-tax allocations reflect more than restaurant and retail purchases by households.

Construction and development cycles, inflation, refunds, reporting adjustments and changes in the geographic location where taxable transactions are reported could also contribute.

There is another technical issue worth watching: local tax structures themselves can change. The Comptroller currently lists San Antonio's city sales and use tax rate at 1.125%, while the San Antonio Advanced Transportation District rate increased effective January 1, 2026. Those are distinct taxing jurisdictions, underscoring why city allocations should not be conflated with every local sales-tax stream associated with San Antonio. Texas Comptroller

Four Mayors, One Long Economic Arc

The dataset continues to span four mayoral administrations.

  • Julián Castro: serving during the dataset period through July 22, 2014
  • Ivy Taylor: 2014–2017
  • Ron Nirenberg: June 21, 2017–June 18, 2025
  • Gina Ortiz Jones: June 18, 2025–present

The City of San Antonio's historical records list Ortiz Jones as taking office June 18, 2025, following Nirenberg.

The 2026 decline is occurring during the Ortiz Jones administration, but the sales-tax series alone cannot attribute that decline to a mayor, council, city manager or particular city policy.

Economic outcomes can reflect decisions made years earlier as well as national interest rates, inflation, federal spending, military activity, tourism, construction cycles, population changes and private investment.

The relevant accountability question is therefore broader:

How is city leadership responding to the economic signals now appearing in the data?

The Question Has Changed

In July, the question was:

Is San Antonio experiencing a temporary pause or the beginning of a broader slowdown?

By September, the evidence supports sharpening that question.

The city has now spent most of 2026 below its comparable 2025 pace. August showed that improvement is possible, but September's 10.39% monthly decline erased part of that recovery.

Meanwhile, Houston, Dallas, Austin, Fort Worth, Arlington, Frisco, El Paso and many other Texas markets remain above their comparable 2025 levels.

So the investigation now becomes:

Why is San Antonio's taxable economy moving differently from much of urban Texas?

Answering that requires moving beyond the sales-tax table.

The next layer should examine hospitality, tourism, employment, wages, business activity, construction, housing, consumer behavior and international travel—and determine which indicators began moving at approximately the same time as the sales-tax slowdown.

For now, the evidence supports a more precise description than it did two months ago:

San Antonio remains a large economy with substantial long-term growth, but its 2026 sales-tax weakness has persisted long enough—and diverged sufficiently from many other major Texas cities—to warrant deeper investigation.

How to Read the Data

Sales-tax allocations are payments distributed by the Texas Comptroller to local jurisdictions. They are useful indicators of taxable economic activity, but they are not GDP, total household consumption or a complete measure of residents' financial well-being.

The Texas Comptroller notes that allocations depend on taxpayer reporting and generally represent sales occurring earlier than the distribution month. Texas Comptroller

Accordingly, this analysis treats the data as an economic signal rather than a comprehensive measure of San Antonio's economy.

Sources and Methodology

The primary dataset is the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Sales Tax Allocation, City, analyzed through report month September 2026. The updated file contains 191,616 records and 10 fields, with 2026 observations through September. Pasted text

Official methodology and current comparison reports are available through the

Texas Comptroller Monthly Sales Tax Allocation Comparison Summary Reports. The Comptroller's September 10, 2026 release reported statewide city allocations up 8.1% for the September distribution and 6.2% year to date. Texas Comptroller

Allocation timing and payment components are documented by the

Texas Comptroller Statewide Local Allocation Payment Detail and the 2026 Sales Tax Allocation Payment Distribution Schedule.

Mayoral dates were verified against the City of San Antonio Mayors & Alcaldes archive.

National Data System analysis: The official city allocation data was standardized into comparable monthly and annual city-level observations. Full-year historical growth is reported only for completed years. The 2026 figures use the Comptroller's comparable year-to-date values rather than comparing nine months of 2026 against twelve months of 2025. City-level comparisons use the September 2026 report period, and no causal explanation for San Antonio's decline is inferred from the sales-tax series alone.

Read more